In Have Gavel, Will Travel, Honeyman and
Cheldelin (2008) note the increasingly global and cross-cultural aspect of
conflict resolution. Indeed, society itself is increasingly global and
cross-cultural, so it should come as no surprise that conflict is increasingly
cross-cultural. This is all relevant for
alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
practitioners
because we must always be aware of and sensitive to diversity and cultural
competency issues. We must provide ADR
services, including conflict resolution education, that respect the
Pilar Vaile, an Albuquerque, New Mexico attorney, arbitrator, mediator and Certified Administrative Law Judge, discusses procedural and policy issues confronting ADR professionals. For more information on the author, please see www.pilarvailepc.com.
Disclaimer and Notice
THIS BLOG SITE IS INTENDED AND DESIGNED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE EITHER LEGAL ADVICE OR THE FORMATION OF AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Mediating Workplace Bullying Claims*
As I have previously written,
bullying is a hot topic today. Cleaning House and Cleaning Up Our Acts - Anti-Bullying
Legislation, and Bullying Legislation, Revisited. As such,
it is natural for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) practitioners
to move into this field. However, caution should be used in doing so, and
practitioners should consider in each case whether mediation is appropriate
and, if so, what it should look like.
In the Fall 2011 issue of the ACR
Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 1, Moira Jenkins asks Is
Mediation Suitable for Complaints of Workplace Bullying? Although she
herself does not appear to come to any firm conclusions, the article raises a
number of helpful points to be considered by managers and individual ADR
practitioners consider the issue. First, as Ms. Jenkins observes,
bullying is often not well defined, and in the workplace bullying may be
confused with a number of other activities that are similar but nonetheless
distinct.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Independent Decision Makers--What to Make of It?
As an Administrative Law Judge and arbitrator, I have felt pressures to conform to the needs or desires of the executive or other party employing me. I have written about this before, in the context of reminding folks that the judiciary is not so special in this regard. See A
Pressured Judiciary--Fact of Life and Cause for Alarm? Indeed, it is likely that the tendency to exert pressure--even if inadvertently and/or subtly--is far greater in the administrative or arbitration contexts, where the adjudicatory decision maker is more likely to work closely and regularly with party representatives.
That is not to say there is something nefarious is going on. It could be as simple as having a casual conversation about procedure that gently blends into due process questions,
Saturday, May 5, 2012
"Insight Mediation"--Just a New Handle for Old School Skills?
The 2011 Winter issue of the ACR Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, includes an article by Cheryl Picard and Marnie Jull describing "insight mediation" as a new and emergent method or style of mediation. Learning Through Deepening Conversations: A Key Strategy of Insight Mediation. The authors attempt to distinguish it from other styles or theories of mediation, and includes some new terms and language, but
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)